Skip to content
The UK Fostering Visibility Index
Methodology: pre-release, fostering-pre.2. Board of 1 September 2026.

Families are searching for fostering near them. Who do they find?

The Index measures how findable every council fostering service in England is on Google and in AI assistants, and whether local families are sent to the council or to a private agency. 147 services, refreshed every month, method published. Nobody can pay to move it.

149,795

Initial fostering enquiries in England in 2024 to 2025. Every one of them started with somebody looking.

Ofsted, Fostering in England 2024 to 2025. Checked 2 September 2026.

45%

Of mainstream fostering households are with private agencies, at an average of £820 a week per child to the council.

Ofsted, Fostering in England 2024 to 2025. Competition and Markets Authority, 2022. Checked 2 September 2026.

102 of 131

Scored services publish no structured data at all, the code that tells Google and AI assistants who they are.

The Index, 1 September 2026 board.

What the Index measures

2 numbers. One you control, one you have to win.

The score tells a council what to fix. The share tells it whether the fix was enough. A score can be finished. A share never is, because it moves every time an agency acts.

The Findability Score

0 to 100

How easy a service is to find on Google and in AI assistants. It measures the council’s own website and listings, so it sits within the council’s control. Fix things and it rises.

Pool average by dimension, 1 September 2026. Councils win where families search and lose where machines read.

Local search
83.6
Crawl
72.9
Citation
49.8
Schema
11.2

Share of Local Fostering Voice

A percentage

Of everything a local family sees when they search Google or ask an AI assistant about fostering near them, the share that belongs to the council and its hub rather than to private agencies. This is the headline number. It can fall while the score rises, if an agency spends more.

One area, one month, illustrative. Read left to right as the results a family is shown.

Private agencyCouncil or hubOther

We publish the share only where we can classify enough of the local results, and we say where we can’t. Never a zero for a service we could not measure.

How the Index works

Measured the same way for every service, client or not.

The scoreboard is independent of who pays. Clients buy improvement in their real visibility, and the ranking follows. They can’t buy the rank.

We ask what a family asks

The searches and the questions prospective carers actually use, in every area, on Google and in AI assistants. Nothing is asked twice in a month.

We measure once a month

Every service in the pool on the same day, so ranks and neighbours stay comparable. A published month is never rewritten.

We publish the method

The weights, the version, the sources and our own corrections are on the methodology page for anyone to check.

We say when we cannot see

A service whose website blocks us is recorded as a data gap with the reason. Never a fake zero, never a half-measured score that looks healthy.

Read the methodology

2 measurements on the same day can differ by up to 2.6 points, so we never sell a single month’s rank. We sell the trend and the share. Our own re-measurement, 7 August 2026. Checked 2 September 2026.

For councils and hubs

We make local families find you first. Then we show you it working.

Councils lose enquiries to private agencies because families can’t find them online. We fix that, as much or as little as you want.

The tool
A private dashboard for your service: your 2 numbers, how you compare with neighbours and agencies, a refresh every month, an action plan with named owners in your team, and your own Search Console data beside our measurements. Your team does the work; we review with you each quarter.
With consultancy
Everything in the tool, plus a person: a written review when you start, a monthly review call, a quarterly report on your local market with a watch on competitors, and, if you want it, hands-on work: pages in your voice, fixes worked through with your web team, a better enquiry route.
Bespoke
Campaigns, website development, training for your team, mystery-enquiry programmes. Scoped and priced on their own.
Talk to us about your service

What we promise, and what we do not

We promise more enquiries, and a bigger share of local enquiries coming to you instead of to agencies. You’ll see it in your own data. We don’t promise more approved carers. That depends on your assessment capacity and your offer, and on how long each step takes. We say so before we’re asked.

Why it pays

It took about 49 enquiries to produce 1 newly approved household in 2024 to 2025.

A council taking 1,000 enquiries a year that lifts them by 5 percent gains around 50 enquiries, about 1 household, 1 to 2 children, and roughly £20,000 to £58,000 a year of agency fees it no longer pays. We never promise the household. We promise the enquiries and the share, and the arithmetic does the rest.

Ofsted, Fostering in England 2024 to 2025 (149,795 enquiries; 3,050 newly approved mainstream households). Devon County Council freedom of information response, 2022 to 2023; Competition and Markets Authority, 2022. Checked 2 September 2026.

49
enquiries per newly approved household
£820
a week per child paid to an agency, on average
5%
enquiry lift in the worked example
1
household, which is 1 to 2 children at home locally
The board

Every service in England, ranked and refreshed monthly.

Search by name, filter by hub, and see the 4 dimensions behind every score. Data gaps are shown after the ranked rows with the reason.

RankServiceTypeHubFindability Score
1Salford City CouncilAuthorityFoster for Greater Manchester75.4
2DevonAuthorityFostering South West75.3
3EalingAuthorityFoster with West London73.9
4BristolAuthorityFostering South West73
5Buckinghamshire CouncilAuthority72.3
131 scored, 16 data gaps, 1 September 2026See the full board

Find your service on the board, then ask us what the number means.

A free conversation about your score, your share and the 3 things we would fix first. We have spent years working alongside councils, and we built the Index to help them attract more foster carers directly.